Tag Archives: #henryjames

Letters and Relationships

An interesting and slightly overlooked recurring motif in James’ What Maisie Knew are letters. Handwritten letters were one of the primary methods of communication prior to the technological age. In the novel, James incorporates letters as indicators which address one of the prominent themes: relationships. There are many types of relationships explored in the novel between every character. One of the most interesting manners in which relationship statuses are reflected between characters is through the exchange of letters. 

As a recurring motif, letters appear sporadically in the novel as a means of communication between characters. Oftentimes the letters are obstructed, an early instance is seen in the first chapter, whilst Maisie is with her father. “Her first term was with her father, who spared her not only in letting her have the wild letters addressed to her by her mother: he confined himself to holding them up at her and shaking them, while he showed his teeth…chucked them, across the room, bang into the fire” (8). This instance reflects the relationship between Ida and Beale as well as the constant projection of anger onto Maisie. Note the association of both Beale and Ida as subtly animal-like, Beale’s animalistic baring of teeth associated with his demeanor, and Ida’s “wild” letters. This violent action sets the tone for Ida and Beale’s behavior as well as foreshadows their complete abandonment of Maisie in the end of the novel. The obstruction of the letters meant for Maisie by her father represents his own interception of Ida and Maisie’s communication and perhaps their potential relationship. 

This interference of letters is common in James’ novel, especially when they’re meant for Maisie. This adds another layer of instability and chaos in Maisie’s life and relationships. This is often seen in the conflict between Mrs. Wix and Mrs. Beale, where Mrs. Beale constantly blocks Mrs. Wix’s “dolefully written” (32) letters to Maisie, “[The] charming woman held in her hand the last letter that Maisie was to receive from Mrs. Wix; it was fortified by a decree abolishing the preposterous tie” (33). Mrs. Beale’s actions are meant to sever the relationship between Maisie and Mrs. Wix because Mrs. Beale declared her an illiterate nobody. She doesn’t succeed in completely breaking up Mrs. Wix and Maisie, but it reflects Mrs. Beale’s character as someone who is possessive and prejudiced towards someone from a lower social class than her. 

The relationship which most relies on written communication is the one between Mrs. Beale and Sir Claude. This is another function of letters, they allow for secret discrete communication between recipients. In chapter eight, Sir Claude and Mrs. Beale meet for the first time and it’s obvious that they like one another despite their recent marriages. Throughout the course of the novel, behind the scenes to Maisie’s narrative, the reader ascertains the affair which Mrs. Beale and Sir Claude are engaged in. Their secret exchange of letters confirms it. But this exchange is seldom mentioned until the moment when Sir Claude, Maisie, and Mrs. Wix are in France and Sir Claude receives a letter from Mrs. Beale which he shares with the others. “It’s a letter to Mrs. Beale from your father, making the rupture between them perfectly irrevocable. It puts an end for ever to their relations” (187-188). This letter which Sir Claude receives, is a letter within a letter, originally from Mr. Farange to Mrs. Beale containing private information on their relationship; then forwarded to Sir Claude. This letter within a letter is representative of all of the adult relationships which Maisie is exposed to in the novel. Each of them are characterized by deceit, secrecy and adultery all of which are represented in the physical form of handwritten letters.

Tagged ,

Maisie’s Psychological Development

In a literary studies course I took years ago, we happened to read Henry James’ The Turn of the Screw. I remember how it was mentioned that James’ older brother William was a pioneer in the field of psychology and this altered the way in which we read the novel. This interesting application of psychology (at the time when the field itself was being developed) into James’ novels is another facet which makes them modern. What Maisie Knew not only illustrates the negligence and selfishness of adults, but it also showcases the developmental psychology of a child. 

The first few chapters of the novel feature many metaphors used to describe Maisie, these metaphors and the corresponding chapters take place at the time when she’s youngest. Meaning she hasn’t fully formulated her own symbolic thought and in place of her voice, the narrator describes her in a series of metaphors which communicate her position for her. Maisie is, “a deep little porcelain cup in which biting acids could be mixed” (5), a “magic-lantern” (8) and a “little feathered shuttlecock” (12). Each of these metaphors speak to the precarious position Maisie is in within the world of her parents. As a porcelain cup and a feathered shuttlecock, she is a supposed inert empty vessel filled with resentment from each parent, and as a sensitive tool of retribution. As a magic lantern, she is an observer of the world around her. Her observations play a role in her cognitive reasoning. She interestingly recognizes her own limitations at a young age, “she found in her mind a collection of images and echoes to which meanings were attachable-images and echoes kept for her in the childish dusk, the dim closet, the high drawers, like games she wasn’t yet big enough to play” (10). Maisie is aware of what is happening around her, she also realizes that there is meaning behind the actions and that at her very young age she isn’t fully able to be an autonomous participant. 

As the novel progresses, Maisie’s cognition develops and she begins to act. In connection to her parents, “She puzzled out with imperfect signs, but with a prodigious spirit, that she had been a centre of hatred and a messenger of insult” (13). Maisie realizes that she’s being used through the perception of her surroundings. She also develops operational thought in which she perceives the occurrences around her in a logical manner. Instead of being an inert object in a game, Maisie evolves into a participant who harbors and strives for her own needs and desires. One of which is the need to protect herself from her parents, “Her parted lips locked themselves with the determination to be employed no longer. She would forget everything, she would repeat nothing” (13). Not only is Maisie protecting herself from their venomous words through silence, but she is also refusing to be a pawn in her parent’s game.

The most striking instance which showcases Maisie’s inner consciousness is when she’s playing with her doll Lisette. During the scene, Maisie recreates the scenarios of the adults in her life with Lisette being Maisie, “She could only pass on her lessons and study to produce on Lisette the impression of having mysteries in her life” (26). Maisie is attempting to make sense of her life by projecting her inner struggles onto the doll. While, “[She] tried hard to discover where she had been, she discovered a little, but she never discovered all” (27). The reader gains insight on Maisie’s consciousness as she logically tries to make sense of who she is and what place she has in the world. This level of thinking and reasoning is an evolvement from being a tool for her parents spitefulness, to refusing to take part in her parents’ game, and now to attempting to make sense of who she is and where she fits. Maisie’s psychological trajectory is an interesting modern angle which James utilizes to successfully explore the themes of morality and family through a child’s point of view.

Tagged , , ,
Skip to toolbar